Can You Really Trust Your Doctor? 

(An opinion - not medical advice)

We have been told for decades that saturated fats and cholesterol are bad for us and the main cause for heart disease.

It seems like forever that we have all been shopping “low fat” and cutting down on butter and replacing it with margarine's etc.

The truth is however completely the opposite. Cholesterol is not the enemy and science has known this for some time now but of course big pharma and the likes of the Heart Foundation don't want to hear it and more importantly, don't want you to hear it.

The Heart Foundation is still pushing polyunsaturated fats and the like even though the science shows that the whole low fat bad cholesterol theory was based on lies from the very start.

My own experience with several doctors regarding my cholesterol blood tests have resulted in me receiving the same advice from each doctor. You need to take statins or you are at risk of dying from a heart attack.

When I responded to the first doctor I was seeing in a clinic in Rockhampton, that "I would take a look at my diet first before taking statins", his response was very interesting. He was on the verge of going into a rage and started ranting about how he had “done 7 years university training as a doctor and then another 4 years doing something or other after that, but then what would he know, as I obviously knew more than him”.

Thankfully I didn't let his rant sway my gut feeling on the matter and simply walked out of his office never to return. I of course did change doctors and was given the same advice over the next several years after having fresh cholesterol blood tests taken. I am happy to say that their response was much more professional.

In fact the very same people who are now telling us that the covid vaccines are a good thing and will save your life have been telling us the same thing about the low fat low cholesterol diet supplemented with statin drugs.

Why on earth would we take any notice of them?

When you can't understand why decisions have been made and are still being made even though there is no logic or common sense or in fact science to back it up, then we need to follow the money.

When you look to see who is profiting by this myth then you don't have to look too far. The very same people who have brought us the Pfizer covid vaccination are still making billions of dollars every year from statin drugs to lower cholesterol.

Statins are the most widely prescribed drugs in the history of medicine. They have been pumping them out since the 1980's.

The problem is that statins inhibit the enzyme which is also required for essential molecules like Co Enzyme Q10. Q10 is essential for heart function so how is that for irony. Our medical professionals are prescribing a drug that they say will save us from heart attacks and is in fact very likely to be a major cause in us having one.

"They" try to tell us or have us believe that cholesterol is a toxic substance that we can do without in our bodies but in fact cholesterol is one of our most important molecules throughout our bodies including our brains. It is in fact a very complex molecule and essential to our very existence and to think that “big pharma” is willing to cover up the truth about it so as to continue making their billions and billions of dollars is shameful although not surprising.

Statins have a long list of side effects and could very well be a big cause of diabetes. The thing is with the “side effects” is that medical trials are often manipulated by having a washout period which means before they choose the people who are going to be in the trial they give everybody the drug and the people who have side effects get excluded from the trial. They then divide the remaining people up into the group taking the drug and the other taking the placebo. So of course the side effects from the drug group are going to be much lower than otherwise would be as all those people who had side effects were never allowed into the trial. This in itself proves that those companies who are using this method with their trials couldn't care less about anything else other than stacking the statistics in their favour and ultimately making them tons of money.

I am at the stage where I basically am afraid to trust anyone offering me so called medical advice, no matter how well intended. Your average doctor hasn't got a clue as to how to make you healthy he simply looks for an illness or disease and treats these. They may be extending our lives and having us live longer but the quality of health is simply not there. Doctors need to be taking more responsibility of their patients health and not simply giving them a drug to eliminate a current problem.

Why would anyone put their lives in the hands of someone who is willing to prescribe a statin drug to you when he is unwilling to look into whether they actually are going to do anything for you. He does so because the drug companies tell him this is what he should do. I might be willing to understand how it came about decades ago when the lie was first spun in order to create the low fat low cholesterol diet industry but science is telling us today that it was all a lie yet we see doctors and the heart foundation and of course big pharma still pushing the same money making mistruth.

When ABC's Catalyst program put to air a two part program “The heart of the matter” in 2013,  which exposed all the lies regarding low fat and also on statins it was initially hailed as a “breakthrough” series. It exposed the myth that the consumption of animal fats causes heart attacks and how we have all been sucked in by the greatest scientific deception of our time. Part 2 also showed us just how statins are not going to stop you having a heart attack and in fact could very well be a risk of giving you one.

The response from big pharma and the Heart Foundation was predictable but an orchestrated campaign was also mounted to discredit the program and what ultimately got the program cancelled was the ABC's own health commentator Dr Norman Swan who went on National radio and said that “people will die if they watch the Catalyst program”. Sydney cardiologist Dr David Celemajer stated “ABC has blood on it's hands” in the Sydney Morning Herald.

The facts are that everything the Catalyst show put across air was factual and fully backed up by science yet “our ABC” pulled the program.

Is it a bit of a coincidence that we have had Norman Swan pushing the vaccination line every week on air since covid first hit our shores? He has been unrelenting on his ABC radio program Coronacast and once again it seems he is ignoring the science the same way he did when he stuck it into the Catalyst program.  He is no doubt still pushing his “low fat diet and low cholesterol rhetoric” even though the science says it is wrong. Should we be listening to his recommendations now on covid vaccinations after he got it so wrong with the statins?

Someone rang up the ABC local Capricornia radio the other day when they were discussing the number of people still not vaccinated in Queensland and a lady texted them saying, “ can we hold the restaurant management accountable if they allow an unvaccinated person in while they are there as a  fully vaccinated family and they were to get covid from them?” The announcer didn't once question the science of this question. He should have said that vaccinated people are spreading the virus just as much or more as the unvaccinated and shot her down with the science. But no-one wants to talk about the facts. They are just doing the job that “big pharma” wants them to and simply ignore the facts.

Not once have I heard from anyone the reasoning as to why we need a covid passport to tell us who has been vaccinated and who has not.

Vaccinated people are still catching the virus and are still spreading it and some countries have reported that vaccinated people are actually spreading it worse as they are carrying more of the virus than the unvaccinated.

So surely, it is the unvaccinated people who should be concerned with the vaccinated. Why are people losing their jobs if they don't get the mandated jab? It's absolutely ludicrous what is happening and once again, if you follow the money where does it lead.......the people making the vaccines.

Why our politicians are being led like sheep and our so called medical experts is beyond me?

I can say however that if you want to put your life in the hands of our politicians, our medical GP's and the drug companies, then go ahead, make their day!

Of further interest as an alternative to saturated fats being the cause of heart disease you might like to read the following.....This has a familiar ending for John Yudkin as per the Catalyst program.

The sugar controversy

In 1972, Pure, White and Deadly was published, written by John Yudkin for a lay readership. Its intention was to summarize the evidence that the over-consumption of sugar was leading to a greatly increased incidence of coronary thrombosis, and that in addition it was certainly involved in dental caries, probably involved in obesity, diabetes and liver disease, and possibly involved in gout, dyspepsia and some cancers.

Yudkin ended the first Chapter: "I hope that when you have read this book I shall have convinced you that sugar is really dangerous." This message was extremely unwelcome to the sugar industry and manufacturers of processed foods. The final Chapter of Pure, White and Deadly lists several examples of attempts to interfere with the funding of his research and to prevent its publication. It also refers to the rancorous language and personal smears used by Ancel Keys to dismiss the evidence that sugar was the true culprit.

Keys wrote, for example:

It is clear that Yudkin has no theoretical basis or experimental evidence to support his claim for a major influence of dietary sucrose in the etiology of CHD; his claim that men who have CHD are excessive sugar eaters is nowhere confirmed but is disproved by many studies superior in methodology and/or magnitude to his own; and his "evidence" from population statistics and time trends will not bear up under the most elementary critical examination. But the propaganda keeps on reverberating ...[54] Unfortunately, Yudkin's views appeal to some commercial interests with the result that this discredited propaganda is periodically rebroadcast to the general public of many countries.[55]

The efforts to discredit the case against sugar were largely successful, and by the time of Yudkin's death in 1995 his warnings were, for the most part, no longer being taken seriously.[citation needed]

Yudkin's arguments and evidence for the dangers of sugar were the focus of several articles in the British Medical Journal of 19 January 2013.[56]

In 2009, Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist of the University of California, San Francisco, Medical School who has a special interest in childhood obesity, made a video called Sugar: The Bitter Truth. Lustig had independently re-discovered and confirmed Yudkin's findings and, pointing to "a hole as big as the one in the USS Cole" in Keys' regression analysis of CHD versus fat and sugar, asked his audience, "Am I debunking?"[57]